Smudboy Trudeau Trying To Police The Internet With A Digital Charter
“https://Lybio.net
The Accurate Source To Find Transcript To Smudboy Trudeau Trying To Police The Internet With A Digital Charter.”
[Smudboy Trudeau Trying To Police The Internet With A Digital Charter]
[Smudboy:] Source: LYBIO.net
So the Viva Technology Conference was a few days ago in Paris. It’s an entrepreneurial tech show with big names like Jack Ma; Ginni Rometty, the IBM CEO; and Martin Villig, the Founder of Bolt, which is like Europe’s version of Uber. And for some reason Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had a conference there and he said some stuff.
[Justin Trudeau:]
Hate and extremism are thriving online.
[Smudboy:] Source: LYBIO.net
Sure, but so is love and community. And one of the main reasons of hatred and extremism is, well, when people in power do things that not everyone likes, like those in the government.
[Justin Trudeau:]
I don’t think anyone here would dispute that. Thanks to the anonymity of the Internet, people can bully, harass, and intimidate nearly anyone who has a Twitter account.
[Smudboy:]
And anyone who has a Twitter account can simply stop using it or block or mute people.
[Justin Trudeau:]
We’re seeing more and more public figures and everyday citizens choosing to step away from social media accounts, silencing their own voices because the rhetoric has gotten so toxic.
[Smudboy:] Source: LYBIO.net
That’s their choice, nothing stopping them from starting up a blog, a podcast, a YouTube channel or whatever. So, no, using Twitter is not silencing users. However, the Twitter platform seems to be banning people simply for having a certain right leading political disposition. And just so you know, Justin is a member of the liberals of the Canadian federal government, which is mostly a centrist to the left leaning political party.
[Justin Trudeau:]
Who can blame them? It’s commentary we wouldn’t tolerate on our streets or in our public spaces.
[Smudboy:]
And thank goodness, the Internet allows people to express themselves without restraint. While this does make some rather interesting shouting matches in either YouTube, Twitter, or other social media, it’s quite cathartic and a good way to engage with other people with opposing views.
[Justin Trudeau:]
Platforms often facilitate and encourage this destructive behavior. And as a result, these same platforms have become a breeding ground for extremists.
[Smudboy:] Source: LYBIO.net
Getting angry at people with the keyboard is not destructive. It also might not be very productive. It’s just words and extremism is going to exist in every walk of life, not just online. It’s like every other kind of information online is just more easily accessible.
[Justin Trudeau:]
With the power of the Internet and through lack of proper oversight, the hateful can champion their views and incite violence.
[Smudboy:]
Well, it’s possible to encourage or start a thread of conversation about anything with any emotion behind it. You can’t incite violence, it’s just words, words, even violent words are not violence. Additionally, if you want to organize a protest or I don’t know, a violent act on social media, police and the platform, they’re monitoring these things.
[Justin Trudeau:]
From behind a computer screen and without consequence. And while these vial views live and fester online, they spill out into the real world with increasingly deadly consequences.
[Smudboy:]
For example?
[Justin Trudeau:]
It is our moral responsibility as leaders in government and in business to denounce this hatred at every turn. We must stand United. We must fight back.
[Smudboy:] Source: LYBIO.net
Why is it morally responsible to denounce such things? One of the beautiful things of a free society is free speech, the freedom to say what you love and hate without censorship or restraint. Moral is defined as an individual’s belief in right and wrong and opposed to ethics, which are society’s laws and how to behave, which are based off morals. There is no need to fight back against people’s ability to express themselves.
I may not like when Joe Blow is saying about white sauce on pasta or whatever, but he has the right to say it. It’s when people start kicking others down wells that we might have a problem.
The Internet is not the problem here. People’s words and ideas are not the problem. People and then committing acts of violence, that’s the problem.
So apparently Canada is launching a digital charter. Justin announced that Canada would be launching a digital charter of sorts, touching on principles including universal access and transparency and serving as a guide to craft new digital policy, and that the Canadian government is taking steps to eliminate fake news that a new task force has been created in order to identify threats to elections and prevent foreign interference.
Yes, because Canada is so important on the world stage because the wave of Facebook advertising from Russia was so influential to federal elections in North America.
Maybe Justin’s afraid of not being reelected because of online communication, and I think it’s his past behavior in government policies that might be the cause of his downfall, not non-Canadian Facebook ads, but ‘hey’, what do I know about the carbon tax or his trip to India, the SNC-Lavalin scandal, the Mark Norman affair, the garbage to the Philippines fiasco, being unable to achieve the goals he promised, like electoral reform or balanced budgets and revenue neutral carbon tax that has only increased the price of energy and gas for at least five provinces, yet done nothing to curb industrial greenhouse emissions, which are higher than the previous conservative government standards.
But do we really need some sort of government digital charter? Why do we need more restrictions? Wouldn’t you want to know where the angry crazy people are online?
I think that’s a better idea than blocking all bad words or deleting threads and content or preventing it in the first place.
And what’s wrong with platforms policing their own?
Just recently, last week, the word cuck got flagged by YouTube spam filter in comments, and I had to approve about 50 of these comments on my channel.
Additionally, the term ‘plot hole’ was grounds for potential demonetization. Since I don’t shut up about ‘plot holes’, we’re rather devastating to this channel. I couldn’t use those terms anymore.
Anyway, what do you guys think?
Do we need a digital charter that all Internet people should be forced to abide by?
How would you enforce it?
What would that involve?
What can’t you see online that would be grounds for a mandate?
Leave your suggestions in the comments below and thanks for watching.
[Connect and Follow Smudboy:]
Thesecondslice.blogspot.ca
Twitter.com/smudboy
Patreon.com/smudboy
Facebook.com/Smudboy-716504118553246/
Smudboy Trudeau Trying To Police The Internet With A Digital Charter. But do we really need some sort of government digital charter? Why do we need more restrictions? Wouldn’t you want to know where the angry crazy people are online? I think that’s a better idea than blocking all bad words or deleting threads and content or preventing it in the first place. Complete Full Transcript, Dialogue, Remarks, Saying, Quotes, Words And Text.