Carey Wedler Anti-Media Banned On FACEBOOK & TWITTER
“https://Lybio.net
The Accurate Source To Find Transcript To Carey Wedler Anti-Media Banned On FACEBOOK & TWITTER.”
[Carey Wedler Anti-Media Banned On FACEBOOK & TWITTER]
Your Page has been unpublished
Your Page has been unpublished tor misleading behavior, such as being administered by a fake account, misleading users. or violating the Facebook spam polices. This goes against the Facebook Pages Terms and Facebook Community Standards which help keep our community safe and respectful. If you think we made a mistake, you can appeal and we’ll lake another look.
You appealed this decision Today at 11:30 AM.
ANTI MEDIA
Community See All
2,120,644 people like this
2,020,965 people follow this
About See All
(619) 432-2684
Typically replies within a few hours
Contact The Anti-Media on Messenger
TheAntiMedia.org
Media/News Company
Hours
Always Open
Sorry, this content isn’t available right now
The link you followed may have expired, or the page may only be visible to an audience you’re not in. Go back to the previous page • Go to News Feed • Visit our Help Center
Your account (@AntiMedia) is currently suspended. For more information, please visit Suspended Accounts. Home Moments Notifications Messages Search Twitter
Hello Carey,
Your account, CareyWedler has been suspended for violating the Twitter Rules.
Specifically, for: Note that if you attempt to evade a permanent suspension by creating new accounts, we will suspend your new accounts. If you wish to appeal this suspension, please contact our support team.
[Carey Wedler:] Source: LYBIO.net
Hello Facebook and Twitter. On October 11th of last year, you unpublished and/or suspended my news organization, the Anti Media, where I’m editor-in-chief from your platforms. Our Facebook page with over 2 million followers was removed from Facebook and just hours later we were cut from Twitter and so was my personal account. We still haven’t been told the real reasons why, but I have been informed that I’m permanently suspended from Twitter.
October 11, 2018
Removing Additional Inauthentic Activity from Facebook
By Nathniel Gleicher, Head of Cybersecurity Policy ad
Oscar Rodriguez, Product
Your Page has been unpublished
Your Page has been unpublished for misleading behavior, such as being administered by a fake account. misleading users, or violating the Facebook spam policies This goes against the Facebook Pages Terms and Facebook Community Standards which help keep our community safe and respectful. If you think we made a mistake, you can appeal and we’ll take another look.
You appealed this decision Today at 11:30 AM
Dedicated Audience Network Support Inbox
@fb.com
to me
Hi Nicholas,
My name is and I’m an Apnea Manager on the Audience Network team here out of the Menlo Park Facebook office. I’d like to thank you for being a loyal and engaged publisher with Audience Network.
We have exciting news to share with you – dedicated account support!
What’s the benefit?
• 1:1 support both your Account Manager,
• Continued technical support from our Solutions
Engineers
• One-on-one meetings to discuss monetization strategy
• Phone calls for continued support
What can you expect? The publisher journey you are
embarking on will consist of the following.
• Deep dive of existing strategy with recommendations
and optimizations
• Knowledge sharing of tools and resources available
through Audience Network
We are excited to roll out this additional level of support and eager to get started. To schedule your first phone call, please select a time via this link https://calendly.com/yulandad/instant-articles-am
Once you’ve reserved a time in the calendar, I’ll send over a format email invite with instructions on how to join the call.
Best,
Audience Network | facebook
@fb.com> Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 12:41 PM
to me
Hi Nick,
Great! Here is $500 worth of ad credit to use towards boosting instant articles posts. This should help you get vamped up! Keep in mind that it needs to be spent by September 30th so you have 1.5 weeks before the code expires!
The goal is to measure your revenue before boosting and after to see if boosting posts gives you incremental revenue lift. Any information on when boosting works best, whether its with a viral post or a newly posted article, etc.,, is also great. Please track your revenue as you run this test. It may be helpful to use a separate placement ID to separate the earnings as well.
The ad credit code is: Let me know if you have any questions or if you’d like to chat about kicking this off. I look forward to syncing up on the results.
As a side note, I’ve been seeing your week over week performance has been seeing a slight decline. Wanted to check in and see if this was natural fluctuations or if you and your team have made any adjustments to posting strategy, changes to content, or anything else?
Best,
[Carey Wedler:] Source: LYBIO.net
But let’s start with you Facebook, you claimed Anti Media was removed for inauthentic and misleading behavior. Now I’m wildly curious how we could be guilty of those things when just a couple months earlier you assigned us a representative to help us grow our page and also gave us free advertising, which we redeemed just two weeks before the purge. That would seem to imply you approved of our content and practices. Could it be that our founder had a few accounts he used on our page or maybe that we shared our content on other pages that also had access to share on ours, maybe but we don’t know because you won’t tell us and you never gave us a warning.
One common type of spam has been posts that hawk fraudulent products like fake sunglasses or weight loss “remedies.” But a lot of the spam we see today is different. The people behind it create networks of Pages using fake accounts or multiple accounts with the same names. They post clickbait posts on these Pages to drive people to websites that are entirely separate from Facebook and seem legitimate, but are actually ad farms. The people behind the activity also post the same clickbait posts in dozens of Facebook Groups, often hundreds of times in a short period, to drum up traffic for their websites. And they often use their fake accounts to generate fake likes and shares. This artificially inflates engagement for their inauthentic Pages and the posts they share, misleading inflates engagement for their inauthentic Pages and the posts they share, misleading people about their popularity and improving their ranking in News Feed. This activity goes against what people expect on Facebook, and it violates our policies against spam.
Facebook made $39.9 billion in ad revenue in 2017
Were talking about ads on Facebook, because Facebook is an advertising juggernaut. Facebook made $39.9 billion in ad revenue in 2017, which is more than just about every other tech company that’s not Google.
APR 10 2018, 3:21 PM ET
by CLAIRE ATKINSON
Your Page has been unpublished
Your Page has been unpublished for misleading behavior such as being administered by a fake account, misleading users, or violating the Facebook spam policies. This goes against the Facebook Pages Terms and Facebook Community Standards which help keep our community safe and respectful. If you think we made a mistake, you can appeal and we’ll take another look.
You appealed this decision Today at 11:30 AM.
[Carey Wedler:]
Your press release also claims that in your purge of hundreds of political pages, you remove people for sending users to add forms with clickbait, which first of all we didn’t do. We actually have a strict policy against clickbait and sensationalism. And besides Facebook, you of all organizations should know ads are essential to surviving as a business. And second of all if the ad services we used ever were too invasive, we removed them because they were glitches because we don’t like invasive clickbait advertising, but at least you provided a reason from the get-go. I will give you that, even though you still haven’t responded to our appeal and even though it’s been over three months and even though you invited us to join you in a partnership.
Hello Carey,
Your account, CareyWedler has been suspended for violating the Twitter Rules.
Specifically, for:
Note that if you attempt to evade a permanent suspension by creating new accounts, we will suspend your new accounts. If you wish to appeal this suspension, please contact our support team.
The Twitter Rules
We believe that everyone should have the power to create and share ideas and information instantly, without barriers. In order to protect the experience and safety of people who use Twitter, there are some limitations on the type of content and behavior that we allow. These limitations are set forth in the Twitter Rules below.
The Twitter Rules (along with all incorporated policies), Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service collectively make up the “Twitter User Agreement” that governs a user’s access to and use of Twitter’s services.
Violence and physical harm
Violence: You may not make specific threats of violence or wish for the serious physical harm, death, or disease of an individual or group of people. This includes, but is not limited to, threatening or promoting terrorism. You also may not affiliate with organizations promoting terrorism. You also may not affiliate with organizations that — whether by their own statements or activity both on and off the platform — use or promote violence against civilians to further their causes.
Suicide or self-harm: You may not promote or encourage suicide or self-harm. When we receive reports that a person is threatening suicide or self-harm, we may take a number of steps to assist them, such as reaching out to that person and providing resources such as contact information for our mental health partners.
Hillary Clinton @HillaryClinton 9 Nov 2016
“To all the little girls watching…never doubt that you are valuable and powerful & deserving of every chance & opportunity in the world.”
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
Only fools, or people with a political agenda, don’t want a Wall or Steel Barrier to protect our Country from Crime, Drugs and Human Trafficking. It will happen – it always does!
Violence and physical harm
Violence: You may not make specific threats of violence or wish for the serious physical harm, death, or disease of an individual or group of people. This includes, but is not limited to, threatening or promoting terrorism. You also may not affiliate with organizations promoting terrorism. You also may not affiliate with organizations that — whether by their own statements or activity both on and off the platform — use or promote violence against civilians to further their causes.
Suicide or self-harm; You may not promote or encourage suicide or self-harm. When we receive reports that a person is threatening suicide or self-harm, we may take a number of steps to assist them, such as reaching out to that person and providing resources such as contact information for our mental health partners.
Child sexual exploitation: You may not promote child sexual exploitation. Learn more about our zero-tolerance child sexual exploitation policy.
Your Military
Hidden toll of US drone strikes in Yemen: Nearly a third of deaths are civilians, not al-Qaida
By: Maggie Michael and Maad al-Zikry, The Associated Press
Barack Obama. @BarackObama – Jan 25
The @ObamaFoundation is connecting people from around the world so they can form partnerships just like this. I am inspired by Robert and Vanessa and what’s possible when leaders come together to have an even greater impact on the world.
Graphic violence and adult content
We consider graphic violence to be any form of gory media related to death, serious injury, violence, or surgical procedures. We consider adult content to be any media that is pornographic and/or may be intended to cause sexual arousal.
Twitter allows some forms of graphic violence and/or adult content in Tweets marked as containing sensitive media. However, you may not use such content in live video, your profile, or header images. Additionally, Twitter may sometimes require you to remove excessively graphic violence. Read more about how we define graphic violence and adult content and how to mark your media as sensitive.
Media depicting decreased individuals: We may require you to remove media that depicts the death of an identifiable individual if we receive a request from their family or an authorized representative. Learn more about how to make such a request.
MEDIA
Twitter still awash in fake news, study finds
By JASON SCHWARTZ | 10/04/2018 05:30 AM EDT
Li Yuan @LiYuan6
I met the Shaos 4 years ago. They exemplify the Chinese dream & the force that lifted China out of poverty. So happy to have finally got the opportunity to tell their story: how an assembly line worker rose to a factory owner & the challenges ahead
Fox News @FoxNews 8 Nov 2018
BREAKING: Federal appeals court rules against Trump administration on DACA
Facebook funds news shows from ABC, Fox, CNN and more
Facebook is now a news producer, financially at least.
The social network on Wednesday announced its first major foray into funding journalism with a series of video news programs from a variety of media companies.
If that sounds to be a scary prospect, the social media giant points out in a new blog that the editorial content is up to the partners involved. Will Facebook be willing to fund news that might be critical of its own practices? That’s not been addressed.
The social media giant, which has been under fire for sharing user data with Chinese device makers and for allowing fake news to proliferate on the platform, is funding shows from Fox News and ABC News, among others.
Hateful conduct: You may not promote violence against, threaten, or harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease. Read more about our hateful conduct policy.
Joe Schmoe
@joeschmoe107
Replying to @JacobAWohl @realDonaldTrump
What’s wrong from banning jews? THey are parasites just like the muslims which the great Donald Trump banned from entering the country. #MAGA2018 #fuckyourfeelings
#fuckjews
3:10 PM – 3 Jul 2018
geordiedeb
@deb_geordie
Replying to @theboyjai
Filthy dangerous perverts #fuckislam #fuckmuslims
#muslimscum
7:00 AM – 2 Aug 2017
[Carey Wedler:] Source: LYBIO.net
Twitter on the other hand you guys told me nothing from the start, which left me to try to figure it out for myself. What rules violations could have possibly gotten me and my news organization removed. Umm ummm ummm… Let me think really hard here. Did I or Anti Media promote violence? Nope. In fact, we actively advocate against it. Unlike the countless people and politicians, who directly violate the Twitter rules by associating with organizations whether by their own statements or activity both on and off the platform that user promote violence against civilians to further their causes, nope. These people and politicians remain on Twitter. Did we depict graphic violence? No. I actually stopped putting images of kids killed by U.S. bombs in my videos because I realized that kind of presentation could get me flagged. Did we promote misleading fake news? Again, no. Unlike many outlets that remain on your platform, many of which spread disinformation that directly promoted and led to mass violence against civilians. In fact, Facebook, you guys gave those instigators even more reach propping them up as reliable sources. Did we promote hate speech also no, in fact sometimes I even talk about love and emotional healing. This is a departure for many of the people still allowed on your platforms, who are violating that rule. Sirs and Madams, lords and masters of Facebook and Twitter what did we do, there has to be a good reason for you to delete us without any kind of warning.
Facebook purged over 800 accounts and pages pushing
political messages for profit
By ELIZABETH DWOSKIN and TONY ROMM | WASHINGTON POST |
OCT 11, 2018 | 2:55 PM | SAN FRANCISCO
Facebook removes another 800 pages and accounts ahead of
midterms
By Oliver Darey, CNN Business
Upldated 4:33 PM ET, Thu October 11, 2018
Source: CNN
Exclusive: Is Facebook doing enough to stop election meddling? 03:39
New York (CNN) – Facebook on Thursday, just weeks before the US midterm elections, announced that it had removed more than 800 pages and accounts that the company said violated its rules “against spam and coordinated inauthentic behaviour.”
The company made the announcement In a blog post which said that “increasingly” spam networks have started using “sensational political content — regardless of its political slant — to build an audience and drive traffic to their websites.”
“And like the politically motivated activity we’ve seen, the ‘news’ stories or opinions these accounts and Pages share are often indistinguishable from legitimate political debate,” the Facebook blog post said.
Los Angeles Times
Facebook said it was removing the publishers and accounts not because of the type of content they posted, but because of the behaviors they engaged in, including spamming Facebook groups with identical pieces of content and using fake profiles.
“Today, we’re removing 559 Pages and 251 accounts that have consistently broken our rules against spam and coordinated inauthentic behavior,” the company said in a blog post. “People will only share on Facebook if they feel safe and trust the connections they make here.”
Today, we’re removing 559 Pages and 251 accounts that have consistently broken our rules against spam and coordinated inauthentic behavior. Given the activity we’ve seen — and its timing ahead of the US midterm elections — we wanted to give some details about the types of behavior that led to this action. Many were using fake accounts or multiple accounts with the same names and posted massive amounts of content across a network of Groups and Pages to drive traffic to their websites. Many used the same techniques to make their content appear more popular on Facebook than it really was. Others were ad farms using Facebook to mislead people into thinking that they were forums for legitimate political debate.
The Washington Post
Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say
By Craig Timberg
November 24, 2016
Editor’s Note: The Washington Post on Nov. 24 published a story on the work of four sets of researchers who have examined what they say are Russian propaganda efforts to undermine American democracy and interests. One of them was PropOrNot, a group that insists on public anonymity, which issued a report identifying more than 200 websites that, in its view, wittingly or unwittingly published or echoed Russian propaganda. A number of those sites have objected to being included on PropOrNot’s list, and some of the sites, as well as others not on the list, have publicly challenged the group’s methodology and conclusions. The Post, which did not name any of the sites, does not itself vouch for the validity of PropOrNot’s findings regarding any individual media outlet, nor did the article purport to do so. Since publication of The Post’s story, PropOrNot has removed some sites from its list.
[Carey Wedler:] Source: LYBIO.net
The likes of the Los Angeles Times and CNN made it sound really legitimate when they quoted and copied and pasted Facebook’s press release without talking to a single banned individual or organization. Are we Russian bots or Asians trying to undermine American democracy for Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, again no. Even though The Washington Post put out a hit piece on us and other anti-war outlets in 2016 that they had to later walk back because it was such an assault on basic journalistic practices.
Hello,
We’re writing to let you know that we have reviewed your appeal, and your account will remain suspended due to violations of the Twitter Rules.
You may not use Twitter’s services in a manner intended to artificially amplify or suppress information, or engage in behavior that manipulates or disrupts people’s experience on Twitter. You can review these guidelines at https://twittetcom/rules.
Please do not respond to this email as replies and new appeals for this account will not be monitored.
Thanks,
Twitter
Friends of Chesterfield Police @FoCHPD Jan 28
We appreciate you!
SUPPORT OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT
PARILESAN @Parilesan
Replying to @OpForPlay #BanGuns
#ImWithHer
Ivar Tangen @IvarTangen
Replying to @JenniferSnowMD @meganranney and 2 others
Repeal #2ndAmendment and #Banguns That’s when it stops.
Stan S @Stan_S_23 Jan 28
Replying to @NBCNews
#BanGuns and #BanTheSecondAmendment
How Is Twitter Affecting Our Mental Health?
Our brains were not designed to process this kind of
information overload.
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
NBC FAKE NEWS, which is under intense scrutiny over their killing the Harvey Weinstein story, is now fumbling around making excuses for their probably highly unethical conduct. I have long criticized NBC and their journalistic standards-worse than even CNN. Look at their license?
ye
@kanyewest
You don’t have to agree with trump but the mob can’t make me not love him. We are both dragon energy. He is my brother. I love everyone. I don’t agree with everything anyone does. That’s what makes us individuals. And we have the right to independent thought.
HOME • MUSIC
Lana Del Rey Threatens to ‘F— Up’
Azealia Banks During a Heated Twitter Feud Over Kanye West
[Carey Wedler:] Source: LYBIO.net
Oh wait, wait hold on, Facebook might have ghosted us, but Twitter got back to me, not Anti Media with a fabricated reason and confirming your suspension of my account Twitter you claimed I behaved in a manner intended to artificially amplifier suppress information. No, no I didn’t. I posted on Twitter like once every two weeks and I barely even knew how to upload a video, let alone artificially warp information. Oh, wait, wait. Here it is. I engaged in behavior that disrupted people’s experience on Twitter. Yep, this must be it because I absolutely [fucking] / [beep] did try to be disruptive. I tried to disrupt the U.S. war machine and people’s blind support for it along with their unquestioning submission to government power. You got me I did it. I tried to disrupt user experiences on Twitter and so did the Anti Media, which again still hasn’t heard back on that appeal, but to others on Twitter not do the same, is Donald Trump not disruptive, Kanye West, wars between pop stars being nasty to each other. Twitter by nature is disruptive. Twitter is a cacophony of rage and screaming and people being cruel and horrible to each other, but calling for peace and justice albeit in a blunt way is what warrant suspension.
The Washington Post
Business
Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say
How to spot fake news
FAKE
Consider these points before sharing an article on Facebook. It could be fake. (Monica Akhtar/The Washington Post)
Some players in this online echo chamber were knowingly part of the propaganda campaign, the researchers concluded, while others were “useful idiots” – a term both born of the Cold War to describe people or institutions that unknowingly assisted Soviet Union propaganda efforts.
RollingStone
The ‘Washington Post’ ‘Blacklist’ Story Is Shameful and Disgusting
The Intercept_
GLENN_GREENWALD
Ben Norton, Glenn Greenwald
November 26 2016
10:17 a.m.
Washington Post Disgracefully Promotes a McCarthyite
Blacklist From a New, Hidden, and Very Shady Group
THE WASHINGTON POST on Thursday night promoted the claims to a new, shadowy organization that smears dozens of U.S. news sites that are critical of U.S. foreign policy as being “routine peddlers of Russian propaganda.” The article by reporter Craig Timberg — headlined ‘Russian propaganda effort helped spread Take news’ during election. ex-
[Carey Wedler:] Source: LYBIO.net
When The Washington Post put out that hit peace in 2016 that included Anti Media, I had a mini existential crisis. Had I forgotten signing up to be a stooge for Putin, was I unwittingly helping the Russian government, had I lost my journalistic integrity, it took two legitimate journalists calling them out to help me remember I cover the stories I do because I genuinely care, but this time around I have no doubt in my mind that the reason you gave for your coordinated bans and suspensions are fabricated, which leads me to wonder the real reasons why.
facebook Newsroom
May 17, 2018
Announcing New Election Partnership With the Atlantic Council***
“Have some integrity, give the money back” is what the Mad World founders told Roose.
But soon, mere algorithmic changes wouldn’t be enough, and the age of outright bans began. On May 17th, Facebook announced it would be working with the Atlantic Council.
Often described by critics as the unofficial lobby group of NATO, the council is a bipartisan rogues’ gallery of senior military leaders, neocons and ex-spies. Former heads of the CIA on its board include Michael Hayden, R. James Woolsey, Leon Panetta and Michael Morell, who was in line to be Hillary Clinton’s CIA chief.
The council is backed financially by weapons-makers like Raytheon, energy titans like Exxon-Mobil and banks like JPMorgan Chase. It also accepts funds from multiple foreign countries, some of them with less-than-sterling reputations for human rights and — notably — press freedoms.
DAILY BEAST
UH OH
Facebook Secretly Shared User Data After Saying It
Stopped
Netflix, AirBnb, Lyft and other companies got special access to info on people’s friends without their knowledge, new documents published by Britain’s Parliament reveal.
[Carey Wedler:] Source: LYBIO.net
Is it that you guys are working with the Atlantic Council, a group run by ex-military, ex-CIA and other powerful establishment figures, as someone who prides herself on journalistic responsibility and caution, I would never claim that with certainty, the tides concerned me, but I don’t know and I can’t know, so I would never claim that that’s the case. But I would love to know, please tell me though with an organization as secretive as yours I’m well aware that’s unlikely to happen.
Kelly Well 12.05.18 12:35 PM ET
The Washington Post
The Switch
Facebook purged over 800 U.S. accounts and pages for pushing political spam
2016 Election
HOW FACEBOOK AND TWITTER QUIETLY HELPED TRUMP WIN
Tech-company “embeds” played a major role in closing the gap between Trump and Clinton, a study shows.
BY MAYA KOSOFF
October 26, 2017 9:56 AM
Vanity Fair
Lawmakers Hint at Regulating Social Media During Hearing With Facebook and Twitter Execs
The Intercept_
GLENN_GREENWALD
Glenn Greenwald
December 30, 2017
6:15 a.m.
Facebook Says It Is Deleting Accounts at the Direction of the U.S. and Israeli Governments
The sites were all over the map politically. Some, like the Trump-supporting Nation in Distress, had claimed Obama would declare martial law if Trump won in 2016. Others, like Reverb and Blue State Daily, were straight-up, Democrat-talking-point sites that ripped Trump and cheered the blues.
Many others, like the L.A.-based Free Thought Project and Anti-Media, were anti-war, focused on police brutality or drug laws, and dismissive of establishment politics in general. Targeting the latter sites to prevent election meddling seemed odd, since they were openly disinterested in elections. “If anything, we try to get people to think beyond the two parties,” says Jason Bassler, a 37-year-old activist who runs the Free Thought Project.
Eric Goldman of the Santa Clara University School of Law calls the problem “soft censorship,” adding, “We’re seeing removal of content that isn’t illegal but the government doesn’t like. It’s a backdoor form of censorship.”
When Rolling Stone asked the Atlantic Council about the apparent contradiction of advising Facebook on press practices when it is funded by numerous speech-squelching foreign governments, it replied that donors must submit in writing to strict terms. The statement reads:
“[The] Atlantic Council is accepting the contribution on condition that the Atlantic Council retains intellectual independence and control over any content funded in whole or in part by the contribution.”
Around the same time the partnership was announced, Facebook made a donation to the Atlantic Council between $500,000 and $999,000, placing it among the biggest donors to the think tank.
[Carey Wedler:] Source: LYBIO.net
Maybe you’re understandably trying to avoid government intervention and imposed a broad stroke of purges to prove you’re taking responsibility for your alleged role in handing the election to Trump. For what it’s worth, I think those allegations are unfair regardless avoiding government intrusions could be behind the purge, but again I can’t prove it, maybe you’re trying to sanitize public opinion that doesn’t fit neatly into the acceptable established thought bubbles, but again I can’t prove it. So I would never claim something like that with any kind of certainty. Clearly, I don’t know why I was banned and suspended. I would love to know. If there’s something I did that violated your standards and you can point to the specifics, I will gladly eat my words and I will even apologize for calling you out, but otherwise whether intentional or not – you guys are limiting legitimate authentic voices in the name of saving democracy while serving the current ruling class and the purge I was caught up in is just the tip of the iceberg.
[Connect and Follow Carey Wedler Anti-Media Banned On FACEBOOK & TWITTER:]
Instagram.com/careywedler
Facebook.com/CareyWedler
Minds.com/careywedler
Steemit.com/@careywedler
Ppatreon.com/CareyWedler
Carey Wedler Anti-Media Banned On FACEBOOK & TWITTER. Sirs and Madams, lords and masters of Facebook and Twitter what did we do, there has to be a good reason for you to delete us without any kind of warning. Complete Full Transcript, Dialogue, Remarks, Saying, Quotes, Words And Text.